Premium
Why Money Growth Determines Inflation in the Long Run: Answering the Woodford Critique
Author(s) -
NELSON EDWARD
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of money, credit and banking
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.763
H-Index - 108
eISSN - 1538-4616
pISSN - 0022-2879
DOI - 10.1111/j.1538-4616.2008.00183.x
Subject(s) - inflation (cosmology) , economics , keynesian economics , monetary policy , new keynesian economics , argument (complex analysis) , interest rate , steady state (chemistry) , monetary economics , macroeconomics , physics , theoretical physics , biochemistry , chemistry
Woodford argues that it is not appropriate to regard inflation in the steady state of New Keynesian models as determined by steady‐state money growth. Woodford instead argues that the intercept term in the monetary authority's interest rate policy rule determines steady‐state inflation. In this paper, I offer an alternative interpretation of steady‐state behavior, according to which it is appropriate to regard steady‐state inflation as determined by steady‐state money growth. The argument relies on traditional interpretations of the central bank's power in the long run and appeals to model properties that are common to textbook and New Keynesian analysis. According to this argument, the only way the central bank can control interest rates in the long run is via affecting inflation, and its only means available for determining inflation is by determining the money growth rate.