Premium
A new perspective on the incentive–blood donation relationship: partnership, congruency, and affirmation of competence
Author(s) -
Chmielewski Danielle,
Bove Liliana L.,
Lei Jing,
Neville Ben,
Nagpal Anish
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
transfusion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.045
H-Index - 132
eISSN - 1537-2995
pISSN - 0041-1132
DOI - 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03545.x
Subject(s) - incentive , donation , crowding out , competence (human resources) , blood donor , marketing , thematic analysis , social psychology , public relations , public economics , business , economics , psychology , microeconomics , medicine , qualitative research , sociology , political science , economic growth , social science , immunology , monetary economics
BACKGROUND: The Motivation Crowding‐out Theory suggests that incentives undermine intrinsic motivation and thus blood donation behavior. While there is strong evidence showing the negative relationship between monetary incentives and blood donation, findings on the effect of nonmonetary incentives are mixed. Set in a voluntary, nonremunerated environment, this study explores aspects of the nonmonetary incentive–blood donation relationship not captured by the crowding‐out hypothesis. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In‐depth interviews were conducted to explore donors' attitudes toward nonmonetary incentives currently used or considered by the Australian Red Cross Blood Service (Blood Service). Transcripts were analyzed using an inductive, thematic approach. RESULTS: Of the nonmonetary incentives examined (i.e., health screening tests, branded tokens, paid time off work, recognition of key milestones, and postdonation refreshments), none were found to crowd out intrinsic motivation, although not all were viewed favorably. Donors who viewed branded tokens negatively considered the cost implications for the Blood Service, while donors who responded positively considered the public benefit of tokens in raising the profile of the Blood Service. Other nonmonetary incentives—paid time off work, postdonation refreshments, and health screening tests—were viewed positively because donors perceived them to be congruent to the effort expended in donating blood. Finally, donors expressed a preference for private over public recognition when acknowledging significant contributions. CONCLUSION: When operating in a voluntary, nonremunerated environment, blood services should view donors as supply partners rather than customers, only consider nonmonetary incentives that are congruent with the act of donation, and provide private rather than public recognition of key milestones.