Premium
A pilot study for screening blood donors in Taiwan by nucleic acid amplification technology: detecting occult hepatitis B virus infections and closing the serologic window period for hepatitis C virus
Author(s) -
Li Lei,
Chen PeiJer,
Chen MingHung,
Chak KinFu,
Lin KuoSin,
Tsai SuJen Lin
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
transfusion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.045
H-Index - 132
eISSN - 1537-2995
pISSN - 0041-1132
DOI - 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01672.x
Subject(s) - window period , virology , serology , occult , medicine , virus , hepatitis b virus , closing (real estate) , nucleic acid , hepatitis c virus , hepatitis a virus , immunology , antibody , biology , pathology , genetics , alternative medicine , political science , law
BACKGROUND: Blood donors in Taiwan currently are screened for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection by immunoassay. The risk of enzyme immunoassay (EIA)‐negative, nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT)‐reactive donations is not well understood. This study aimed to screen for such donors in Taiwan by a multiplex test (cobas TaqScreen, Roche) on a commercially available NAT system (cobas s 201 system, Roche). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: NAT was performed on donors without prescreening in pools of six and NAT‐reactive pools were then resolved to the single donation. Individual‐donor NAT–reactive samples were discriminated by a commercially available polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–based diagnostic assay (COBAS AmpliScreen, Roche). Samples with EIA‐ and NAT‐discordant results were investigated with supplemental serologic and confirmatory tests. Each sample taken from follow‐up of HBV NAT yield cases was tested for HBV serologic profile, NAT, and viral load. The sensitivity and performance efficacy were also evaluated. RESULTS: The 95 percent limit of detection (LOD) for HBV, HCV, and HIV were 5.09, 11.83, and 62.53 IU per mL, respectively. Among 10,727 seronegative donations, 12 HBV NAT yield cases (0.11%) and 1 HCV NAT yield case (0.01%) were detected. Follow‐up results for 1 to 8 months showed that the HCV yield case was a window case and all HBV NAT yield cases were occult carriers. CONCLUSION: The use of NAT detected occult HBV and reduced HCV window period. The yield rate, especially occult HBV, was 10‐ to 100‐fold higher than that in developed, HBV nonendemic countries. Therefore, NAT implementation for routine donor screening in a more cost‐effective manner should contribute to safer blood transfusion in Taiwan.