Premium
Twice‐daily plasma exchange for patients with refractory thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: the experience of the Oklahoma Registry, 1989 through 2006
Author(s) -
Nguyen Loan,
Li Xiaoning,
Duvall Deanna,
Terrell Deirdra R.,
Vesely Sara K.,
George James N.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
transfusion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.045
H-Index - 132
eISSN - 1537-2995
pISSN - 0041-1132
DOI - 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01530.x
Subject(s) - thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura , medicine , refractory (planetary science) , plasmapheresis , platelet , gastroenterology , pediatrics , immunology , physics , antibody , astrobiology
BACKGROUND: Twice‐daily plasma exchange has been used for patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) who are unresponsive to treatment with daily plasma exchange for many years but with no clear evidence of effectiveness. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The 18 years' experience of The Oklahoma TTP‐HUS (hemolytic‐uremic syndrome) Registry, 1989 through 2006, with twice‐daily plasma exchange for 31 episodes of TTP in 28 patients is reported. A definite response to twice‐daily plasma exchange was defined a priori as a platelet (PLT) count increase after twice‐daily plasma exchange on two separate occasions during the treatment of a single episode of TTP, with no change of other treatments. A possible response was defined as a PLT count increase after initiation of twice‐daily plasma exchange only once with or without change of other treatments. RESULTS: A definite response to twice‐daily plasma exchange occurred in 3 episodes (three patients), 27 episodes had a possible response, and 1 episode had no response. The three patients with a definite response had ADAMTS13 activities of 5, 6, and 12 percent and all had an inhibitor; the patient with no response was subsequently determined to have Rocky Mountain spotted fever. CONCLUSION: Twice‐daily plasma exchange was typically considered in acutely ill patients who had initially responded but then severe thrombocytopenia recurred, often with new neurologic abnormalities, while continuing daily plasma exchange. In three patients, twice‐daily plasma exchange appeared to be beneficial. In most patients, a benefit of twice‐daily plasma exchange could not be clearly documented because other treatments were initiated or intensified.