z-logo
Premium
The Canadian donor health assessment questionnaire: can it be improved?
Author(s) -
Goldman Mindy,
Ram Shefali S.,
Yi QiLong,
O’Brien Sheila F.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
transfusion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.045
H-Index - 132
eISSN - 1537-2995
pISSN - 0041-1132
DOI - 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.01048.x
Subject(s) - interview , recall , medicine , cognitive interview , psychology , family medicine , cognition , psychiatry , political science , law , cognitive psychology
BACKGROUND: The donor health assessment questionnaire (DHAQ) plays an important role in ensuring blood safety. The Canadian DHAQ has been developed over many years on an ad hoc basis and has never been evaluated in light of cognitive science principles. In addition, donor attitudes about its mode of administration have not been assessed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Between May and August 2005, a total of 456 donors participated in the study by completing the DHAQ, followed by a short, scripted interview assessing recall (as an indicator of attention to the questions) of 17 specific items queried on the DHAQ and attitudes toward interviewer or self‐administration of the DHAQ. RESULTS: Overall, 7.5 percent of donors were able to correctly identify all 17 items. Recall was best for questions asked as individual items (87%‐99%) and decreased substantially for items that are part of a list (55%‐91%). Position effects were demonstrated, with items at the end of a list being the most frequently forgotten. Twenty percent of repeat donors favored the current practice of interviewer administration of high‐risk questions, whereas 80 percent were neutral or favored self‐administration. CONCLUSION: The current format of the Canadian DHAQ is not optimal for donor attention to specific questions asked as part of a list. The majority of repeat donors are ready for a change in the method of administration of the DHAQ. Studies on donor recall may help guide evidence‐based changes to the DHAQ.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here