Premium
Economics, D arwinism, and the Case of Disciplinary Imports
Author(s) -
Cojanu Valentin
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
american journal of economics and sociology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.199
H-Index - 38
eISSN - 1536-7150
pISSN - 0002-9246
DOI - 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2012.00867.x
Subject(s) - causality (physics) , discipline , positive economics , economics , epistemology , mechanism (biology) , common ground , sociology , social science , philosophy , physics , quantum mechanics , communication
The problem of causality in economics is still contended by various epistemological alternatives. The article builds on the received view of D arwinism in economics and examines the way in which economics and biology find common ground in concepts and assumptions that reflect causal commonalities of the natural and the social world. We claim that the role the contingent pattern plays in understanding socioeconomic change provides reasons to concede corrections to a rule‐based causal mechanism. The article concludes on the merits of advancing the ontological equivalent of interdisciplinary studies as one possible standard in reference to which to judge the epistemic adequacy of any import.