z-logo
Premium
Pareto, Parsons, and the Boundary Between Economics and Sociology
Author(s) -
Dalziel Paul,
Higgins Jane
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
american journal of economics and sociology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.199
H-Index - 38
eISSN - 1536-7150
pISSN - 0002-9246
DOI - 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2006.00444.x
Subject(s) - pareto principle , sociology , economic sociology , positive economics , epistemology , logical conjunction , point (geometry) , social science , neoclassical economics , economics , philosophy , mathematics , operations management , linguistics , geometry
A bstract .  Recent discussions of the separation bUniversity of Bremenetween economics and sociology in the United States highlight the way Talcott Parsons used Vilfredo Pareto's Trattato di Sociologia Generale to propose that economics study logical actions and sociology study nonlogical actions. This article argues instead that in Pareto's treatise: (1) sociology is a synthetic discipline concerned with the study of human society in general; (2) human behavior is nearly always logical from a subjective point of view; and (3) sociology studies both logical and nonlogical behavior judged from an objective viewpoint. Thus, Pareto is an important intellectual ancestor for economic sociology.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here