Premium
Henry George the Classical Model and Technological Change: * The Ignored Alternative to the Single Tax in Progress and Poverty
Author(s) -
Petrella Frank
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
american journal of economics and sociology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.199
H-Index - 38
eISSN - 1536-7150
pISSN - 0002-9246
DOI - 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1981.tb01388.x
Subject(s) - economics , population , poverty , george (robot) , population growth , neoclassical economics , income distribution , technological change , development economics , labour economics , economic growth , sociology , inequality , macroeconomics , mathematics , history , demography , mathematical analysis , art history
A bstract .Henry George's vision of land monopolization as the source of growing rentier income was compatible with all elements in the predominant Ricardian‐Millian classical distribution model except the rent‐reducing effects of technological change and Malthusian population growth as the catalyst underlying income distribution. Since George also rejected Malthusianism on ethical and philosophical grounds, his analysis focused on the autonomous nature of rent income with respect to population and technological change. George analyzed the distributive consequences of both increasing technology with constant population, and constant technology with increasing population. In the latter case, George, in an ultimate rejection of Malthusianism, demonstrated an optimistic increasing returns to scale of population growth. However, although capable, George never considered a logical extension of his analysis, namely, the dynamic case of changing population, technology, and increasing returns. This analysis would have contradicted his predictions of the trend in relative income shares and the uniqueness of the single tax as the solution to social and economic distress.