Premium
The Nature of Urban Land
Author(s) -
Qadeer M. A.
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
american journal of economics and sociology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.199
H-Index - 38
eISSN - 1536-7150
pISSN - 0002-9246
DOI - 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1981.tb01385.x
Subject(s) - prosperity , externality , equity (law) , land use , economics , natural resource economics , economic geography , resource (disambiguation) , geography , environmental planning , economic growth , political science , microeconomics , civil engineering , law , engineering , computer network , computer science
A bstract . Considerations about land interpose into almost every aspect of urban life. They may not be the only factor determining a city's well‐being but appropriate land policies are necessary to bring about prosperity and equity. Contemporary accounts of the ‘urban crisis’ and of urban problems reveal the pervasiveness of land issues. Use of one urban land parcel has bearing on the usability of neighboring sites, which makes land a community resource. Urban land may be defined as land used or expected to be used for urban activities. Its attributes include location, space, property, clustering, heterogeneity and immobility and indestructibility. Neo‐classical theorists, by stressing accessibility and ignoring externalities and other attributes of land, achieved only an unrealistic understanding of it. Most land economists are institutionalists , their theory encompassing long‐validated concepts about the nature of land. The neo‐Marxian approach has many points of congruence with the institutionalist one. Empirically investigated, urban land is found to be different from economic goods and hence its production, allocation and disposition must proceed at least like other public goods.