DESPERATELY SEEKING Ψ

Many, I think Hinton among them, think, stronger, that there is good reason to suppose that there is no such thing as Ψing; and that such can be seen from careful reflection on what it is that we take seeing, and, more broadly, visual experience, to be. ose who so think are oen called (even by themselves) disjunctivists. Others think otherwise—Tyler Burge, apparently, on both counts. He is, at any rate, against what he calls ‘disjunctivism’. He thinks this blatantly false, moreover at odds with (what should be) known results of science. He writes of disjunctivism,