Pain Processing: Paradoxes and Predictions

During the last 25 years, there have been substantial advances in our understanding of the physiology and pathophysiology of pain. The development of animal models that more closely mimic clinical pain in humans has helped elucidate the putative mechanisms by which chronic pain develops and is maintained. However, our increased understanding of the neurobiology of pain has not translated into breakthrough treatments for pain management. As such, chronic pain is still primarily managed by drugs whose primary indication does not include pain (eg, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, antiarrhythmics, local anesthetics). These adjuvant analgesics have come into favor despite the fact that the mechanisms through which these drugs provide pain relief remain either largely unknown or are not selective for a single target. Moreover, the efficacy of adjuvant analgesics in animal models of pain is often validated only after case studies or clinical trials have been reported. This retrospective validation of “novel” analgesics in animal models of pain raises a question of the predictive validity of these models. This article reviews the use of several adjuvant and standard analgesics currently used to treat difficult‐to‐manage pain. What can these drugs teach us about the development of novel pain medicines? Within this context, the use of animal models of pain to predict analgesic efficacy in clinical pain conditions is considered.