Premium
Views of People with Intellectual Disabilities of Their Present and Future Living Arrangements
Author(s) -
McConkey Roy,
Sowney Margaret,
Milligan Victoria,
Barr Owen
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.592
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1741-1130
pISSN - 1741-1122
DOI - 10.1111/j.1533-1598.2006.00103.x-i1
Subject(s) - bedroom , independent living , focus group , psychology , group home , preference , activities of daily living , perception , independence (probability theory) , assisted living , gerontology , medicine , business , marketing , geography , statistics , mathematics , archaeology , neuroscience , psychiatry , economics , microeconomics
To determine personal perceptions and preferences of present and potential living arrangements, 180 adults with intellectual disabilities were recruited to participate in 20 focus groups held across Northern Ireland. About half were living with family carers and the balance in a range of other types of accommodations. Verbal probing and video clips were used to elicit views on four different living options (residential homes, small group homes, supported living, and living with a nonrelated family). Four personal preference themes emerged that were common to all participants irrespective of where they lived: having their own bedroom, participating in household activities; having access to community activities, and maintaining contact with family and friends. Adults living on their own or in supported housing valued their independence and having access to support staff, whereas adults living in residential homes spoke of the importance of relationships with co‐residents and staff. Overall, most of the adults were content with their present situation, although small group homes and supported living arrangements were the most popular alternatives to living with their families. The discussion group process was useful in eliciting comments and offering participants a chance to reflect on their personal perceptions of housing options. Overall, the findings point to the need for greater consideration of personal preferences in home option choice‐making by housing and services providers.