z-logo
Premium
Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of avian demineralized bone matrix in heterotopic beds
Author(s) -
Reza Sanaei M.,
Abu Jalila,
Nazari Mojgan,
A.B. Mohd Zuki,
Allaudin Zeenathul N.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
veterinary surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.652
H-Index - 79
eISSN - 1532-950X
pISSN - 0161-3499
DOI - 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2013.12057.x
Subject(s) - demineralized bone matrix , medicine , dbm , demineralization , implant , context (archaeology) , matrix (chemical analysis) , soft tissue , dentistry , bone matrix , biomedical engineering , anatomy , pathology , surgery , cartilage , biology , materials science , amplifier , paleontology , optoelectronics , enamel paint , cmos , composite material
Objective To evaluate the osteogenic potential of avian demineralized bone matrix (DBM) in the context of implant geometry. Study Design Experimental. Animals Rock pigeons (n = 24). Methods Tubular and chipped forms of DBM were prepared by acid demineralization of long bones from healthy allogeneic donors and implanted bilaterally into the pectoral region of 24 pigeons. After euthanasia at 1, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks, explants were evaluated histologically and compared by means of quantitative (bone area) and semi quantitative measures (scores). Results All explants had new bone at retrieval with the exception of tubular implants at the end of week 1. The most reactive part in both implants was the interior region between the periosteal and endosteal surfaces followed by the area at the implant‐muscle interface. Quantitative measurements demonstrated a significantly ( P  = .012) greater percentage of new bone formation induced by tubular implants (80.28 ± 8.94) compared with chip implants (57.64 ± 3.12). There was minimal inflammation. Conclusions Avian DBM initiates heterotopic bone formation in allogeneic recipients with low grades of immunogenicity. Implant geometry affects this phenomenon as osteoconduction appeared to augment the magnitude of the effects in larger tubular implants.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here