Premium
Comparison of Fixation Methods for Treatment of Long Bone Fractures in Llamas and Alpacas
Author(s) -
Brounts Sabrina H.,
Racette Molly,
Muir Peter
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
veterinary surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.652
H-Index - 79
eISSN - 1532-950X
pISSN - 0161-3499
DOI - 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2010.00760.x
Subject(s) - medicine , ulna , humerus , internal fixation , external fixation , surgery , tibia , femur , bone healing , fixation (population genetics) , external fixator , metacarpal bones , population , environmental health
Objective: To determine outcome after repair of long bone fractures in llamas and alpacas. Study Design: Case series. Animals: Llamas (n=11) and alpacas (8). Methods: Medical records (1998–2008) of camelids with long bone fractures were reviewed for history, repair method, and complications. Outcome was also assessed by owner telephone questionnaire. Results: Mean age at repair was 39 months. There were 8 males and 11 females. Fracture distribution was tibia (n=6), metatarsus (5), metacarpus (4), radius and ulna (2), humerus (1), and femur (1), with 13 closed and 6 open fractures. Fracture repair was by internal fixation (n=11), external fixation with a transfixation pin cast (5), external coaptation (2), and cross‐pinning (1). In 1 llama, the limb was amputated to revise a failed external fixation repair. Seventeen animals (89%) were discharged, and 2 were euthanatized. Outcome was available for 13 animals: 9 were used for breeding and 4 as pets. Fewer major complications occurred with internal fixation than with external fixation with a transfixation pin cast ( P <.005); however, there were no significant differences in minor complications between groups. Conclusions: Internal fixation with bone plates was associated with fewer major complications than external fixation with a transfixation pin cast.