Premium
Retrospective Analysis of Dental Implants Placed and Restored by Advanced Prosthodontic Residents
Author(s) -
Barias Pamela A.,
Lee Damian J.,
Yuan Judy ChiaChun,
Sukotjo Cortino,
Campbell Stephen D.,
Knoernschild Kent L.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of prosthodontics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.902
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1532-849X
pISSN - 1059-941X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2012.00902.x
Subject(s) - medicine , implant , dentistry , demographics , survival rate , dental implant , prosthodontics , retrospective cohort study , orthodontics , surgery , demography , sociology
Purpose : The purposes of this retrospective clinical review were to: (1) describe the demographics of implant patients, types of implant treatment and implant‐supported prostheses in an Advanced Education in Prosthodontic Program, (2) evaluate the survival rate of dental implants placed by prosthodontic residents from 2006 to 2008, and (3) analyze the relationship between resident year of training and implant survival rate. Material and Methods : All patients who received dental implants placed by prosthodontic residents from January 2006 to October of 2008 in the Advanced Prosthodontic Program at the University of Illinois at Chicago College of Dentistry were selected for this study. Age, gender, implant diameter, length, implant locations, surgical and restorative detail, and year of prosthodontic residency training were collected and analyzed. Life‐table and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were performed based on implants overall, locations, year of training, and use of a computer‐generated surgical guide. A Logrank statistic was performed between implant survival and year of prosthodontic residency training, location, and use of computer‐generated surgical guide (α= 0.05). Results : Three hundred and six implants were placed, and of these, seven failed. Life‐table and Kaplan–Meier analyses computed a cumulative survival rate (CSR) of 97% for overall implants and implants placed with a computer‐generated surgical guide. No statistical difference was found in implant survival rates as a function of year of training ( P = 0.85). Conclusion : Dental implants placed by prosthodontic residents had a CSR comparable to previously published studies by other specialties. The year of prosthodontic residency training and implant failure rate did not have any significant relationship.