Premium
Residual Thermal Stress Simulation in Three‐Dimensional Molar Crown Systems: A Finite Element Analysis
Author(s) -
Bonfante Estevam A,
Rafferty Brian T.,
Silva Nelson R.F.A.,
Hanan Jay C.,
Rekow Elizabeth Dianne,
Thompson Van P.,
Coelho Paulo G.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of prosthodontics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.902
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1532-849X
pISSN - 1059-941X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2012.00866.x
Subject(s) - materials science , veneer , composite material , crown (dentistry) , residual stress , cubic zirconia , ultimate tensile strength , thermal expansion , stress (linguistics) , dental porcelain , compressive strength , core (optical fiber) , ceramic , finite element method , structural engineering , philosophy , linguistics , engineering
Purpose: To simulate coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE)‐generated stress fields in monolithic metal and ceramic crowns, and CTE mismatch stresses between metal, alumina, or zirconia cores and veneer layered crowns when cooled from high temperature processing. Materials and Methods: A 3D computer‐aided design model of a mandibular first molar crown was generated. Tooth preparation comprised reduction of proximal walls by 1.5 mm and of occlusal surfaces by 2.0 mm. Crown systems were monolithic (all‐porcelain, alumina, metal, or zirconia) or subdivided into a core (metallic, zirconia, or alumina) and a porcelain veneer layer. The model was thermally loaded from 900°C to 25°C. A finite element mesh of three nodes per edge and a first/last node interval ratio of 1 was used, resulting in approximately 60,000 elements for both solids. Regions and values of maximum principal stress at the core and veneer layers were determined through 3D graphs and software output. Results: The metal‐porcelain and zirconia‐porcelain systems showed compressive fields within the veneer cusp bulk, whereas alumina‐porcelain presented tensile fields. At the core/veneer interface, compressive fields were observed for the metal‐porcelain system, slightly tensile for the zirconia‐porcelain, and higher tensile stress magnitudes for the alumina‐porcelain. Increasingly compressive stresses were observed for the metal, alumina, zirconia, and all‐porcelain monolithic systems. Conclusions: Variations in residual thermal stress levels were observed between bilayered and single‐material systems due to the interaction between crown configuration and material properties.