Premium
Metal‐Ceramic Interface Evaluation of a Gold‐Infiltrated Alloy
Author(s) -
Vasani Rupal,
Kawashima Isao,
Ziebert Gerald J.,
Berzins David W.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of prosthodontics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.902
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1532-849X
pISSN - 1059-941X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2009.00480.x
Subject(s) - materials science , scanning electron microscope , ceramic , alloy , metal , optical microscope , electron microprobe , composite material , surface finish , metallurgy , surface roughness , bond strength , layer (electronics) , adhesive
Purpose: The success of metal‐ceramic systems partially depends on the formation of a stable bond between metal and porcelain. The purpose of this study was to investigate the porcelain/metal interface and the mechanism of interfacial bonding in a gold‐infiltrated alloy (Captek). Materials and Methods: Captek specimens with feldspathic porcelain were evaluated by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), electron probe microanalysis (EPMA), X‐ray diffraction (XRD), and the Schwickerath crack initiation test for metal‐ceramic bond compatibility. Specimens were processed with or without Capbond, a bonding agent. A traditional metal‐ceramic alloy was also analyzed with microscopy for comparative purposes. Results: Optical and scanning electron micrographs of Captek specimens processed with Capbond revealed close adaptation of porcelain to the surface of the metal with sporadic nodules extending from the Captek surface. In contrast, the specimens of Captek without Capbond showed a much flatter porcelain/metal interface. Comparatively, the porcelain/metal interface of the traditional metal‐ceramic crown showed greater surface roughness than the Captek specimens. No metal oxides were observed at the porcelain/metal interface of the Captek specimens with XRD. During the Schwickerath test, the Captek specimens permanently deformed, not allowing for crack initiation at the porcelain/metal interface. Conclusions: Microscopy and XRD analysis showed that micromechanical interlocking is the primary mechanism of porcelain adherence to Captek metal. The use of Capbond prior to porcelain application to Captek results in gold nodules on the surface to aid retention. Existing metal‐ceramic bond compatibility standardized tests are not sufficient for evaluating Captek, primarily due to the flexibility of the material.