Premium
Flexural Strength of Glass‐Infiltrated Zirconia/Alumina‐Based Ceramics and Feldspathic Veneering Porcelains
Author(s) -
Bottino Marco Antonio,
SalazarMarocho Susana M.,
Leite Fabiola P.P.,
Vásquez Vanessa C.,
Valandro Luiz Felipe
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of prosthodontics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.902
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1532-849X
pISSN - 1059-941X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2009.00462.x
Subject(s) - materials science , flexural strength , composite material , ceramic , cubic zirconia , sintering , veneer , glass ceramic , tile
Purpose: To compare the flexural strength of two glass‐infiltrated high‐strength ceramics and two veneering glass‐ceramics. Materials and Methods: Four ceramic materials were tested: two glass‐infiltrated high‐strength ceramics used as framework in metal‐free restorations [In‐Ceram Zirconia IZ (Gr1) and In‐Ceram Alumina IA (Gr2)], and two glass‐ceramics used as veneering material in metal‐free restorations [Vita VM7 (Gr3) and Vitadur‐α (Gr4)]. Bar specimens (25 × 5 × 2 mm 3 ) made from core ceramics, alumina, and zirconia/alumina composites were prepared and applied to a silicone mold, which rested on a base from a gypsum die material. The IZ and IA specimens were partially sintered in an In‐Ceram furnace according to the firing cycle of each material, and then were infiltrated with a low‐viscosity glass to yield bar specimens of high density and strength. The Vita VM7 and Vitadur‐α specimens were made from veneering materials, by vibration of slurry porcelain powder and condensation into a two‐part brass Teflon matrix (25 × 5 × 2 mm 3 ). Excess water was removed with absorbent paper. The veneering ceramic specimens were then removed from the matrix and were fired as recommended by the manufacturer. Another ceramic application and sintering were performed to compensate the contraction of the feldspar ceramic. The bar specimens were then tested in a three‐point bending test. Results: The core materials (Gr1: 436.1 ± 54.8; Gr2: 419.4 ± 83.8) presented significantly higher flexural strength (MPa) than the veneer ceramics (Gr3: 63.5 ± 9.9; Gr4: 57.8 ± 12.7). Conclusion: In‐Ceram Alumina and Zirconia were similar statistically and more resistant than VM7 and Vitadur‐α.