Premium
The Effect of Engaging the Screw Access Channel of an Implant Abutment with a Cement‐Retained Restoration
Author(s) -
Naik Supritha,
Tredwin Christopher J.,
Nesbit Michael,
Setchell Derrick J.,
Moles David R.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of prosthodontics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.902
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1532-849X
pISSN - 1059-941X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2008.00408.x
Subject(s) - abutment , casting , materials science , cementation (geology) , implant , dental abutments , universal testing machine , dentistry , orthodontics , cement , composite material , ultimate tensile strength , structural engineering , engineering , medicine , surgery
Purpose: Factors affecting the retention of fixed prostheses to natural abutments are well understood. In contrast, little is known concerning the factors influencing the retention of fixed prostheses cemented to implant abutments. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect that extending a casting into the screw access channel of an implant abutment has on the retention when cemented using Temp Bond. Materials and Methods: Replace Select Straight abutments received set modifications (buccal wall removal at 15°, 22°, and 30°) using a milling machine; controls were unmodified. Two castings were fabricated for each of the modified abutments, one with and one without an extension into the screw access channel. Following cementation with Temp Bond under standardized conditions, the castings were removed from the abutments using an Instron machine, and the peak removal force was recorded. Results: Extending the casting into the screw access channel significantly ( p < 0.001) increased the peak load of removal. Significant differences ( p < 0.05) were found between no modification and 30° modification, 15° and 30° modification, and 22° and 30° modification in the groups when the casting extended into the abutment. In the group where the casting did not extend into the abutment, all groups were significantly different ( p < 0.001) with the exception of 22° and 30° modification. Conclusions: The increased load required to remove a casting that extends into the screw access channel of an implant abutment may compensate for loss in retention, which occurs through unfavorable modification of the abutment.