Premium
Preloads Generated with Repeated Tightening in Three Types of Screws Used in Dental Implant Assemblies
Author(s) -
Byrne Declan,
Jacobs Stuart,
O'Connell Brian,
Houston Frank,
Claffey Noel
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of prosthodontics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.902
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1532-849X
pISSN - 1059-941X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2006.00096.x
Subject(s) - preload , abutment , fixation (population genetics) , materials science , torque , orthodontics , implant , titanium alloy , dentistry , structural engineering , alloy , composite material , medicine , engineering , surgery , population , hemodynamics , physics , environmental health , thermodynamics
Purpose:Abutment screw loosening, especially in the case of cemented single tooth restorations, is a cause of implant restoration failure. This study compared three screws (titanium alloy, gold alloy, and gold‐coated) with similar geometry by recording the preload induced when torques of 10, 20, and 35 Ncm were used for fixation.Materials and Methods : Two abutment types were used—prefabricated preparable abutments and cast‐on abutments. A custom‐designed rig was used to measure preload in the abutment–screw–implant assembly with a strain gauge. Ten screws of each type were sequentially tightened to 10, 20, and 35 Ncm on ten of the two abutment types. The same screws were then loosened and retightened. This procedure was repeated. Thus, each screw was tightened on three occasions to the three insertion torques. A linear regression model was used to analyze the effects on preload values of screw type and abutment type for each of the three insertion torques.Results : The results indicated that the gold‐coated screw generated the highest preloads for all insertion torques and for each tightening episode. Further analysis focused on the effects of screw type and abutment type for each episode of tightening and for each fixation torque. The gold‐coated screw, fixed to the prefabricated abutment, displayed higher preloads for the first tightening at 10, 20, and 35 Ncm. Conversely, the same screw fixed to the cast‐on abutment showed higher values for the second and third tightening for all fixation torques. All screws showed decay in preload with the number of times tightened. Given the higher preloads generated using the gold‐coated screw with both abutment types, it is more likely that this type of screw will maintain a secure joint when tightened for the second and third time.Conclusion:All screw types displayed some decay in preload with repeated tightening, irrespective of abutment type and insertion torque. The gold‐coated screw showed markedly higher preloads for all insertion torques and for all instances of tightening when compared with the uncoated screws.