z-logo
Premium
An evaluation of the viscoelastic characteristics of soft denture liners
Author(s) -
Tamura Fumiyo,
Suzuki Shiro,
Mukai Yoshiharu
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
journal of prosthodontics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.902
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1532-849X
pISSN - 1059-941X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2002.00270.x
Subject(s) - polyolefin , materials science , viscoelasticity , composite material , silicone , silicone rubber , creep , natural rubber , elasticity (physics) , mold , layer (electronics)
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the viscoelastic characteristics of a group of soft denture liners by means of a creep test. Materials and Methods The materials evaluated included a silicone rubber base direct liner (Sofreliner MS), a polyolefin base indirect liner (Molteno S), and a conventional tissue conditioner (Coe Soft) as a control. Cylindrical specimens of each material were fabricated using a metal mold. Half of the specimens were subjected to mechanical fatigue with a 75‐N load at 1.2 Hz for 200,000 cycles. The creep test was performed on each material and condition with and without a fatigue test using low‐load conditions to achieve a 10% strain on all specimens. Viscosity and elasticity were measured, and the data were statistically analyzed using 1‐way analysis of variance and Fisher's Protected Least Significant Difference (PLSD) test ( p < 0.05 ). Results The silicone rubber direct liner (1.31 ± 2.1 MPa) exhibited a similar mean elastic property as the conventional tissue conditioner (0.90 ± 0.22 MPa) and an intermediate viscosity between the conventional tissue conditioner (0.11 ± 0.01 GPa · s) and polyolefin base indirect liner (9.84 ± 1.08 GPa · s). The elasticity did not change for polyolefin and silicone rubber after the fatigue process. Significant differences in the viscosity of silicone rubber were seen with and without fatigue testing ( p ≤ 0.05 ). Conclusions The silicone rubber was as soft as the tissue conditioner and softer than the polyolefin liner. The stiffer the material, the lower the permanent deformation observed.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here