Premium
Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Alginate Impression Materials
Author(s) -
Cohen Brett I.,
Pagnillo Mark,
Deutsch Allan S.,
Musikant Barry
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
journal of prosthodontics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.902
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1532-849X
pISSN - 1059-941X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1995.tb00340.x
Subject(s) - mathematics , impression , factorial experiment , dentistry , computer science , statistics , medicine , world wide web
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dimensional stability of three different alginate impression materials (Jeltrate [Caulk Dentsply, LD Caulk Division, Dentsply International, Milford, DE], Hydrogum [Zhermack, Padoua, Italy], and a new hydrophilic alginate material [Essential Dental Systems, South Hackensack, NJ]) under five different storage conditions. Materials and Methods The study was divided into four groups with at least eight samples in each group. The five storage conditions were as follows: immediate, 10 minutes with a wet towel, 30 minutes without a wet towel, 1 hour with a wet towel, and 24 hours with a wet towel. A 4 × 5 factorial two‐way analysis of variance (P < .05) was used on each dependent variable. Dunnett's test was used to compare each alginate with Jeltrate. Results The new hydrophilic alginate (group 4, 2:2) showed smaller measurements in the buccolingual and diagonal dimensions compared with Jeltrate (control). Conclusions The immediate method (measured buccolingually and diagonally) produced more accurate casts for the alginate materials studied. All other materials studied were similar statistically. The new hydrophilic alginate in group 3 resulted in similar dimensional accuracy compared with Jeltrate and Hydrogum and incorporated 25% less water.