Premium
Systematic Review: Individuals' Goals for Surrogate Decision‐Making
Author(s) -
Kelly Brenna,
Rid Annette,
Wendler David
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03937.x
Subject(s) - cinahl , psycinfo , medicine , scopus , medline , qualitative research , distress , family medicine , qualitative property , inclusion (mineral) , clinical psychology , nursing , psychology , social psychology , psychological intervention , computer science , law , social science , machine learning , sociology , political science
Objectives To determine to what extent current practice promotes the goals of individuals who did not designate a surrogate while competent with respect to decision‐making during periods of decisional incapacity. Design Systematic literature search for studies published in English and listed in P ubMed, S copus, E mbase, CINAHL , or P syc INFO . Studies were eligible if they provided quantitative or qualitative empirical data on how adults want treatment decisions to be made for them during periods of incapacity. Setting Primarily U nited S tates, with six other countries. Participants Fourteen qualitative articles, representing 11 distinct data sets, and 26 quantitative articles, representing 25 distinct data sets, providing data on the views of 22,828 individuals, met the inclusion criteria. Most of the respondents were elderly or seriously ill. Measurements Quantitative surveys and qualitative interview studies assessing individuals' goals. Results The majority wanted close family members to act as their surrogate. The most common reason for preferring family members was the belief that they know which treatments the patient would want. Individuals also wanted to reduce the burden on their families. There was significant variation in the extent to which respondents wanted their surrogates to have leeway when making treatment decisions. Conclusion Individuals have three primary goals with respect to making treatment decisions for them during periods of incapacity: involve their family, treat them consistently with their own treatment preferences, and reduce the burden on their family. Unfortunately, prior systematic reviews have found that family members often are not able to determine which treatment patients want, and family members frequently experience substantial distress when acting as surrogates. These findings suggest that current practice frequently fails to promote individuals' primary goals for treatment decision‐making. Future research should evaluate ways to better promote individuals' goals. In the meantime, clinicians should be aware of these findings and should encourage patients to document their own goals, including their treatment preferences and their preferences regarding how they want decisions to be made for them during periods of decisional incapacity.