Premium
After Adoption: Sustaining the Innovation A Case Study of Disseminating the Hospital Elder Life Program
Author(s) -
Bradley Elizabeth H.,
Webster Tashonna R.,
Baker Dorothy,
Schlesinger Mark,
Inouye Sharon K.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53451.x
Subject(s) - medicine , dissemination , information dissemination , gerontology , world wide web , telecommunications , computer science
Objectives: To examine key factors that influence sustainability in the diffusion of the Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP) as an example of an evidence‐based, multifaceted, innovative program to improve care for hospitalized older adults. Design: Longitudinal, qualitative study between November 2000 and November 2003 based on 102 in‐depth interviews every 6 months during HELP implementation. Setting: Thirteen hospitals implementing HELP. Participants: Forty‐two hospital staff members (physician, nursing, volunteer, and administrative staff) implementing HELP, conducted 102 interviews. Measurements: Staff experiences sustaining the program, including challenges and strategies that they viewed as successful in addressing these challenges. Results: Of the 13 hospitals studied, 10 were sustaining HELP at the end of the study period; three terminated the program (after 24 months, 12 months, and 6 months). Critical factors were identified as influencing whether the program was sustained: the presence of clinical leadership, the ability and willingness to adapt the original HELP protocols to local hospital circumstances and constraints, and the ability to obtain longer‐term resources and funding for HELP. Conclusion: Recognizing the need for sustained clinical leadership and funding as well as the inevitable modifications required to sustain innovative programs can promote more‐realistic goals and expectations for health services researchers, clinicians, and policy makers in their laudable efforts to translate research into practice.