Premium
The Identification of Seniors At Risk Screening Tool: Further Evidence of Concurrent and Predictive Validity
Author(s) -
Dendukuri Nandini,
McCusker Jane,
Belzile Eric
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52073.x
Subject(s) - medicine , predictive validity , concurrent validity , emergency department , external validity , depression (economics) , receiver operating characteristic , scale (ratio) , randomized controlled trial , geriatric depression scale , psychiatry , depressive symptoms , clinical psychology , psychometrics , anxiety , psychology , social psychology , physics , quantum mechanics , economics , internal consistency , macroeconomics
Objectives: To evaluate the validity of the Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) screening tool for detecting severe functional impairment and depression and predicting increased depressive symptoms and increased utilization of health services. Setting: Four university‐affiliated hospitals in Montreal. Design: Data from two previous studies were available: Study 1, in which the ISAR scale was developed (n=1,122), and Study 2, in which it was used to identify patients for a randomized trial of a nursing intervention (n=1,889 with administrative data, of which 520 also had clinical data). Participants: Patients aged 65 and older who were to be released from an emergency department (ED). Measurements: Baseline validation criteria included premorbid functional status in both studies and depression in Study 2 only. Increase in depressive symptoms at 4‐month follow‐up was assessed in Study 2. Information on health services utilization during the 5 months after the ED visit (repeat ED visits and hospitalization in both studies, visits to community health centers in Study 2) was available by linkage with administrative databases. Results: Estimates of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for concurrent validity of the ISAR scale for severe functional impairment and depression ranged from 0.65 to 0.86. Estimates of the AUC for predictive validity for increased depressive symptoms and high utilization of health services ranged from 0.61 to 0.71. Conclusion: The ISAR scale has acceptable to excellent concurrent and predictive validity for a variety of outcomes, including clinical measures and utilization of health services.