Premium
Hearing Loss in Community‐Dwelling Older Persons: National Prevalence Data and Identification Using Simple Questions
Author(s) -
Reuben David B.,
Walsh Kathleen,
Moore Alison A.,
Damesyn Mark,
Greendale Gail A.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02758.x
Subject(s) - medicine , hearing loss , confidence interval , logistic regression , odds ratio , national health and nutrition examination survey , demography , audiology , gerontology , population , environmental health , sociology
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of hearing loss among community‐dwelling older persons according to clinical criteria and to develop a brief self‐report screening instrument to detect hearing loss DESIGN: Survey SETTING: National probability sample of noninstitutionalized older persons PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2506 persons aged 55 to 74 who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hearing loss as defined by Ventry and Weinstein (VW) criteria and by the High Frequency Pure‐Tone Average (HFPTA) scale RESULTS: Hearing loss by VW criteria was present in 14.2% and by HFPTA criteria in 35.1% of those surveyed. The prevalence increased with advancing age and was higher among men and those with less education. A logistic regression model identified six independent factors for hearing loss by VW criteria: age ≥ 70 years (adjusted odds‐ratio (AOR) 2.7, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.6, 4.4), male gender (AOR 3.0, 95% CI 1.9, 4,8), ≤ 12th grade education (AOR 3.8, 95% CI 1.8, 7.7), having seen a doctor for deafness or hearing loss (AOR 8.9, 95% CI 5.3, 14.9), unable to hear a whisper across a room (AOR 3.2, 95% CI 2.0, 5.1), and unable to hear a normal voice across a room (AOR 6.2, 95% CI 2.6, 14.9). A clinical scale based on the logistic model had 80% sensitivity and 80% specificity in predicting hearing loss using VW criteria and 59% sensitivity and 88% specificity in predicting hearing loss using HFPTA criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing loss, as defined by two clinical criteria, is common and can be screened for accurately using simple questions that assess sociodemographic and hearing‐related characteristics. J Am Geriatr Soc 46:1008–1011, 1998 .