Premium
The Caretaker Obstreperous‐Behavior Rating Assessment (COBRA) Scale
Author(s) -
Drachman David A.,
Swearer Joan M.,
O'Donnell Brian F.,
Mitchell Ann L.,
Maloon Alan
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb02012.x
Subject(s) - medicine , dementia , inter rater reliability , rating scale , test (biology) , reliability (semiconductor) , clinical psychology , psychiatry , physical therapy , disease , psychology , developmental psychology , paleontology , power (physics) , physics , pathology , quantum mechanics , biology
Objective To evaluate the usefulness and reliability of the Caretaker Obstreperous‐Behavior Rating Assessment (COBRA), a new test instrument for caretaker assessment of types and severity of “obstreperous behaviors” (OBs) in demented patients. Design COBRA was completed by caretakers of 31 outpatients and 36 nursing home inpatients with dementia. Test‐retest reliability was determined when 25 of the outpatient caretakers re‐evaluated their demented relative 1 week later; inter‐rater reliability was determined on nursing home inpatients by comparing the reports of two nurse's aids with equivalent knowledge of seven of the patients. Setting (1) University medical center Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Clinic; (2) community nursing home. Patients Thirty‐one sequentially‐seen outpatients with dementia; 36 nursing home patients with dementia. Intervention Following instruction in the use of the COBRA Scale, caretakers provided scores for their demented patient. The instrument has three unique features: (1) it divides OBs into four categories for ease of comprehension: Aggressive/Assaultive; Mechanical/Motor; Ideational/Personality; and Vegetative; (2) a companion videotape shown to caretakers in advance illustrates each behavior to improve reliability of reporting; (3) the significance of each OB is estimated with severity and frequency measures. Main Outcome Measurements Frequency and severity of OBs are epitomized in 12 summary scores. Test‐retest correlations (for outpatients) and inter‐rater correlations (for inpatients) were analyzed with Pearson Product Moment and Spearman Rank Order correlations. Results Prevalence of OBs and severity was reported for the experimental groups. Summary scores revealed test‐retest correlations of .95 to .73 for 11 of 12 scores (outpatients), and inter‐rater correlations of .99 to .73 for 8 of 12 scores (inpatients). Age, gender, and disease etiology were not significantly related to OBs; clinical severity correlated with type and severity of OBs. Conclusions The COBRA scale provides a convenient, comprehensive, and reliable means for caretakers to identify the types and measure the severity of OBs in demented outpatients and nursing home inpatients. If additional studies confirm these observations, COBRA will be a useful instrument for assessing the effects of interventions on OBs in patients with dementia.