Premium
State Initiatives in Geriatric Education
Author(s) -
Weiler Philip G.,
Orgren Rosemary A.,
Smukler Charles
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1987.tb06360.x
Subject(s) - geriatrics , medicine , state (computer science) , legislature , gerontology , curriculum , underdevelopment , medical education , political science , psychiatry , law , algorithm , computer science
Although the basic requisites of curricula in geriatrics and gerontology have been well developed, and the need for such programs is well established, the support for development of geriatric academic programs has not been commensurate with the need. Barriers to the development of such programs include ageism, financial disincentives., scientific underdevelopment, a dearth of trained faculty, the lack of institutional support, and the declining federal role. One attempt to overcome these barriers and address the tremendous need is the development of state initiatives. In the last decade, several state legislatures have begun to provide support for geriatric education. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the initiatives of state funded university programs in geriatrics and gerontology, with particular emphasis on the California experience. A survey involving 50 states was conducted using two rounds of structured telephone interviews. The survey results found that 44 states did not have any legislatively initiated support for geriatric programs in higher education. Six states did have such programs, they included: Ohio, North Carolina, Kansas, New York, Kentucky, and California. The components of the California program are discussed in further detail. The conclusions were that although these states provide paradigms for the rest of the nation, much more still needs to be done. Several issues raised by the state programs are discussed.