Premium
Social Support and Alternatives to Institutionalization for the At‐Risk Elderly
Author(s) -
LINDSEY ADA M.,
HUGHES ELIZABETH M.
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1981.tb01270.x
Subject(s) - institutionalisation , medicine , referral , social support , mental health , gerontology , activities of daily living , confusion , geriatrics , personal care , psychiatry , nursing , family medicine , psychology , psychoanalysis , psychotherapist
Selected findings are reported from a follow‐up study conducted to determine what happened to persons aged 65 or older who were referred for evaluation to an urban Geriatric Evaluation Service (GES) but who were not approved by the GES for admission to a mental hospital. Reasons given for the referral included both physical and behavioral problems. The alternatives to institutionalization were based upon the nature of the available social support system, and the functional health status. The family provided most of the care for its aged ill, and the adult children provided most of the social support. In the absence of support by adult children, other relatives gave the necessary care, which included a wide range of services such as personal care, housekeeping, cooking, running errands, transporting, and the important service of just being present or available. Community services were used infrequently. The majority of the subjects were in the “poor health” category and required supervision or care for impaired mobility, one or more physical health problems, and sometimes for mental confusion or disorientation