Premium
The Fallacy of Generalizing from Egg Salad in False‐Belief Research
Author(s) -
Pezdek Kathy,
Freyd Jennifer J.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
analyses of social issues and public policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.479
H-Index - 31
eISSN - 1530-2415
pISSN - 1529-7489
DOI - 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2009.01178.x
Subject(s) - disgust , dieting , generalization , fallacy , psychology , social psychology , medicine , epistemology , obesity , pathology , philosophy , anger , weight loss
Geraerts et al. (2008) reported that misleading individuals with false beliefs about having gotten sick on egg salad in childhood can reduce the probability of subsequently consuming egg salad. They concluded that their results “… have important implications for people's food and dieting choices…” (p. 752). We argue that their conclusion represents a fundamental generalization problem. We report new findings that, together with other recent studies, data on disgust and the fact that hard boiled eggs produce a chemical associated with rotten food, suggest that Geraerts et al.'s success in reducing individuals’ interest in eating egg salad is likely restricted to less appealing foods that are less frequently consumed. Because of potential applicability of their results to public health and well‐being, and the more general applicability of the false‐feedback paradigm to legal cases, it is important to accurately limit these conclusions and generalizations.