Premium
Genetic Determinants of Alcohol Addiction and Metabolism: A Survey in Italy
Author(s) -
Pastorelli Roberta,
Bardazzi Gabriele,
Saieva Calogero,
Cerri Annalisa,
Gestri Donella,
Allamani Allaman,
Airoldi Luisa,
Palli Domenico
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
alcoholism: clinical and experimental research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.267
H-Index - 153
eISSN - 1530-0277
pISSN - 0145-6008
DOI - 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2001.tb02202.x
Subject(s) - allele , genotype , genotyping , cirrhosis , allele frequency , ethanol metabolism , medicine , alcohol dependence , addiction , genetics , biology , gene , alcohol , psychiatry , metabolism , biochemistry
Background: Although multiple genes are involved in alcoholism and can contribute differently to the risk of dependence and liver damage, no studies have investigated susceptibility to addiction in combination with susceptibility to liver damage due to differences in ethanol metabolism. Methods: We evaluated the role of three polymorphic genes related to alcohol metabolism ( CYP2E1 ) and, possibly, dependence ( DRD2 and SLC6A4 promoter) in a series of 60 alcoholics admitted to a specialized referral center in Florence, Italy. Eighteen had a diagnosis of liver cirrhosis. A control series of 64 blood donors were identified at the same hospital. Genotyping was done by polymerase chain reaction‐restriction fragment length polymorphism methods. Results: No difference was found in the frequency of the CYP2E 1 Rsa I c2 allele (2.5% among alcoholics and 4.7% among controls) and the Dra I C allele (6.7% and 10.1%). Similarly, no difference was found in the frequency of the DRD2 A1 allele (15.8% and 13.3%) and the B1 allele (10.8% and 8.6%). The proportion of controls with a combined B1 genotype ( B1/B1 or B1/B2 ) was significantly associated with smoking ( p = 0.03). The distribution of the S and L allele of the SLC6A4 gene was similar in the two groups, with 15% and 14%, respectively, homozygous S/S carriers. A significant association, however, emerged in the group of alcoholics, with a five times higher risk for S/S carriers of developing cirrhosis ( p < 0.05). This association with liver persisted even after exclusion of the subgrouped of 10 hepatitis C virus positive alcoholics. Conclusions: Overall, our results provided no evidence of an increased susceptibility to develop alcoholism that was associated with the three genotypes investigated, either alone or in combination. An increased risk of developing liver cirrhosis for S/S homozygous carriers among alcohol‐dependent patients was observed for the first time.