Premium
Effect of Exogenous GM1 on Ethanol Sensitivity in Selectively Bred Mouse Lines
Author(s) -
Ullman M. David,
Ventura Robert F.,
Draski Laura J.,
Deitrich Richard A.,
Baker Rodney C.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
alcoholism: clinical and experimental research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.267
H-Index - 153
eISSN - 1530-0277
pISSN - 0145-6008
DOI - 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1997.tb03819.x
Subject(s) - ethanol , sensitivity (control systems) , chemistry , food science , biology , biochemistry , engineering , electronic engineering
Ethanol sensitive long‐sleep (LS) and ethanol resistant short‐sleep (SS) mice are lines that have been genetically selected for differential central nervous system sensitivities to the hypnotic effect of ethanol. Because they were genetically selected only for differences in sensitivity to ethanol hypnosis, biochemical and physiological differences between them are likely related to their differential ethanol sensitivity. The synaptosomal and whole brain concentration of GM1 ganglioside was previously shown to differ significantly between the lines. Further, GM1 alters membrane responses to ethanol, including a differential effect on LS and SS synaptosomal membrane disordering. Therefore, GM1 was administered intracerebroventricularly (icv) with micro‐osmotic pumps, to partially bypass the blood‐brain barrier and to test its effect on CNS sensitivity to ethanol hypnosis in LS and SS mice. In the first experiment, 3 days' infusion of GM1 (20 μg/μl, 24 μl/day), saline control and treated LS and SS mice were tested for both regaining of the righting reflex and waking brain ethanol concentration. Incorporation of 3 H‐GM1 into brain membranes was verified by scintillation spectroscopy. GM1 did not alter ethanol sensitivity or brain ethanol concentration at time of waking in LS mice. Conversely, SS mice treated with GM1 were significantly more sensitive to ethanol hypnosis than saline controls as measured by the time to regain the righting reflex (“sleep time”? and waking brain ethanol concentrations. In the second experiment, GM1‐treated SS mice were again significantly more sensitive to ethanol hypnosis than saline controls. GM1 incorporation into the contralateral and ipsilateral cerebral hemispheres was determined by high‐performance liquid chromatography.