z-logo
Premium
Carbohydrate‐Deficient Transferrin as a Measure of Immoderate Drinking: Remaining Issues
Author(s) -
Allen John P.,
Litten Raye Z.,
Anton Raymond F.,
Cross Gerald M.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
alcoholism: clinical and experimental research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.267
H-Index - 153
eISSN - 1530-0277
pISSN - 0145-6008
DOI - 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1994.tb00043.x
Subject(s) - carbohydrate deficient transferrin , transferrin , predictive value , ethnic group , heavy drinking , value (mathematics) , psychology , medicine , clinical psychology , alcohol consumption , environmental health , human factors and ergonomics , alcohol , biology , poison control , statistics , biochemistry , political science , mathematics , law
A growing body of investigations demonstrate that elevated levels of carbohydrate‐deficient transferrin (CDT) effectively distinguishes alcoholics recently consuming large amounts of alcohol from light social drinkers or teetotalers. Nevertheless, important questions still remain concerning the value of CDT as a more generalized marker of alcohol consumption. Most important, the nature of the drinking pattern, including quantity and frequency, necessary to raise levels of CDT significantly remains unclear. Neither has research convincingly demonstrated that CDT is as accurate a marker for women, young adults, or non‐Caucasian ethnic groups as for White, middleaged men. Whereas CDT might serve as a useful outcome measure in trials of alcoholism treatment effectiveness, current research suggests that CDT is of limited value in identifying problematic drinking in general medical or community settings in which a broad continuum of drinkers is represented. Combining CDT with other biochemical or self‐report screening measures may, however, improve sensitivity in these contexts. At present, the most accurate laboratory technique to detect CDT seems to be isoelectric focusing. Additional research, however, is needed to resolve the issue of whether CDT is best quantitated as a simple value or if its ratio to total transferrin or non‐CDT results in higher predictive validity.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here