Premium
BIOCHEMICAL, PHYSIOLOGICAL, AND MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF SEXUAL ISOLATION IN THE SPECIES COMPLEX CLOSTERIUM PERACEROSUM‐STRIGOSUM‐LITTORALE (CHLOROPHYTA) 1
Author(s) -
Sekimoto Hiroyuki,
Sone Yutaka,
Fujii Tadashi
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
journal of phycology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.85
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1529-8817
pISSN - 0022-3646
DOI - 10.1111/j.1529-8817.1995.tb02557.x
Subject(s) - protoplast , biology , antiserum , blot , chlorophyta , southern blot , microbiology and biotechnology , biochemistry , botany , algae , genetics , dna , antibody , gene
ABSTRACT Closterium strains obtained from Japan ( NIES‐64 and ‐65 ) and Nepal ( NIES‐67 and ‐68 ) have been classified as the same taxonomic species; however, they are sexually isolated from each other. When NIES‐64 and ‐65 cells were separately incubated in a medium in which both strains had previously been cultured together, release of protoplasts from both strains was observed. We suggest that factors responsible for the release of protoplasts from cells of both NIES‐64 and ‐65 are produced in a mixed culture of these cells and function during conjugation. These factors, however, had no effect on the release of protoplasts from cells of strains NIFS‐67 or ‐68. Alternatively, a protein that is responsible for the release of protoplasts from cells of NIES‐68, called the protoplast‐release‐inducing protein ( PR‐IP ), had no effect on the release of protoplasts from cells of strains NIES‐64 or ‐65. When the media obtained from the culture of NIES‐64 and ‐65 cells at various mixing ratios were analyzed by western blotting with antiserum to a 42‐kDa subunit of PR‐IP, no cross reaction was detected. In Southern hybridization analysis, no hybridizing band was observed when genomic DNAs of NIES‐64 and ‐65 cells were probed with cDNAs encoding the two subunits of PR‐IP. We suggest from these results that the factors responsible for the release of protoplasts from NIES‐64 and ‐65 cells are not structurally similar to PR‐IP. It is known that the release of PR‐IP from NIES‐67 cells can be induced by the action of another sex pheromone ( PR‐IP inducer ) which is released by NIES‐68 cells. In contrast, no protoplast‐release‐inducing activity was observed from either NIES‐64 or ‐65 in a culture medium conditioned by opposite strains. We suggest that the conjugation systems employed by strains NIES‐64/ NIES‐65 and strains NIES‐67 /NIES‐68 differ, and we propose a possible mechanism of sexual isolation between these biological species .