Premium
Factors predictive of resilience and vulnerability in new‐onset epilepsy
Author(s) -
Taylor Joanne,
Jacoby Ann,
Baker Gus A.,
Marson Anthony G.,
Ring Adele,
Whitehead Margaret
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
epilepsia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.687
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1528-1167
pISSN - 0013-9580
DOI - 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02775.x
Subject(s) - epilepsy , vulnerability (computing) , resilience (materials science) , psychology , medicine , psychiatry , computer science , physics , computer security , thermodynamics
Summary Purpose: Epilepsy has been associated with reduced quality of life (QOL), but QOL outcomes are heterogeneous. Some people are able to maintain a good QOL despite poorly controlled epilepsy and others report poor QOL despite well‐controlled epilepsy. Maintaining a good QOL in the face of adversity is embodied by the concept of resilience. We explored the factors associated with having a resilient outcome in people with epilepsy (PWE). Our definition of adversity included socioeconomic disadvantage as well as continuing seizures. Methods: We analyzed data collected as part of the Standard and New Antiepileptic Drugs (SANAD) trial. At the end of 4‐year follow‐up, patients were classified into four groups on the basis of seizure control (good/poor) and socioeconomic status (advantaged/disadvantaged). We identified individuals with resilient and vulnerable outcomes and the factors associated with having them. Key Findings: Seizure control was more important in determining QOL than material advantage, but socioeconomic status appeared to act as an additional protective or risk factor for QOL. Significant predictors of a resilient outcome were absence of depression and fewer adverse treatment effects at 4 years and good QOL at baseline. Significant predictors of a vulnerable outcome were fair/poor health perception, presence of depression, reduced sense of mastery, and more adverse treatment effects at follow‐up. Significance: Reducing the adverse effects of treatment, along with psychosocial interventions to increase self‐mastery, reduce health concerns, treat depression, and promote positive adjustment to a diagnosis will likely improve the QOL of PWE despite less favorable clinical and socioeconomic circumstances.