Premium
Epileptiform Propagation Patterns Mediated by NMDA and Non‐NMDA Receptors in Rat Neocortex
Author(s) -
Telfeian Albert E.,
Connors Barry W.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
epilepsia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.687
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1528-1167
pISSN - 0013-9580
DOI - 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb02032.x
Subject(s) - cnqx , nmda receptor , ampa receptor , neuroscience , neocortex , picrotoxin , kainate receptor , chemistry , glutamate receptor , long term depression , biophysics , antagonist , receptor , biology , biochemistry
Summary:Purpose: The neocortex can generate various forms of epileptiform activity, including one that depends on N ‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA)‐type glutamate receptors (NMDARs), and another dependent on non‐NMDA‐type (AMPA) glutamate receptors (AMPARs). Previous work in vitro suggests that both forms of activity are initiated by neurons of layer 5, but the spatial patterns of horizontal propagation have been studied only for the AMPAR form. We have tested the hypothesis that both types of epileptiform activity spread via common pathways in one cortical layer, suggesting that lamina‐specific intervention might selectively interrupt both. Methods: Slices of rat somatosensory cortex were maintained in vitro and treated with the γ‐aminobutyric acid type A (GABA A )‐receptor antagonist picrotoxin. Single all‐or‐none epileptiform discharges were evoked with an electrical stimulus, and extracellular microelectrodes were used to track the vertical and lateral spread of the discharges. Results: In both high and low concentrations of picrotoxin, the non‐NMDAR antagonist 6‐cyano‐7‐nitroquinoxaline‐2,3‐dione (CNQX) completely blocked propagation, whereas the NMDAR antagonist D‐2‐amino‐5‐phosphonovaleric acid (DAPV) only shortened the duration of discharges. When extracellular [Mg 2+ ] was reduced in the presence of picrotoxin and CNQX, NMDAR‐dependent epileptiform discharges could be initiated. NMDAR‐dependent discharges spread at about one fifth the conduction velocity of AMPAR‐dependent events. Analysis of spatiotemporal field‐potential patterns suggested that both NMDAR‐ and AMPAR‐mediated propagation involved early activity in layers 5 and 6, followed by larger‐amplitude activity in upper cortical layers along the path of propagation. Conclusions: Our results imply that a common pathway mediates the propagation of these two forms of epileptiform activity, and suggests that lamina‐specific surgical intervention might maximize anticonvulsant effect while minimally disrupting cortical function.