Premium
Significance of Spikes Recorded on Intraoperative Electrocorticography in Patients with Brain Tumor and Epilepsy
Author(s) -
Tran Teresa A.,
Spencer Susan S.,
Javidan Manoucher,
Pacia Steven,
Marks David,
Spencer Dennis D.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
epilepsia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.687
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1528-1167
pISSN - 0013-9580
DOI - 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1997.tb01203.x
Subject(s) - electrocorticography , epilepsy , medicine , epilepsy surgery , anesthesia , resection , surgery , psychiatry
Summary:Purpose: Patients with medically intractable epilepsy due to brain tumors may undergo resective surgery for treatment of both the tumor and the epilepsy. In this instance, the extent of surgical resection is sometimes guided by spikes recorded on intraoperative electrocorticography (ECoG). Whether spikes recorded by electrocorticography imply active epileptogenicity has not been addressed adequately. Methods : We performed preresection and postresection electrocorticography on 36 patients with brain tumor and seizures. There were 3 I low‐grade gliomas, 4 high grade gliomas, and 1 dysembryonic neuroepithelial tumor. Patients had resection of the tumor to normal tissue margins only. No additional surgery was performed, based on electrocorticography findings. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group I (no seizures or rare seizures after resection) and Group I1 (recurrent seizures). Recorded spikes were analyzed for spike distribution and spike discharge rate. Results : On preresection ECoG, 85% of patients in Group I and 88% of patients in Group I1 had spikes. In Group I, 70% of patients had spikes over the tumor bed, and 63% of patients had spikes in the surrounding tissue. In Group 11, 55% of patients had spikes over the tumor bed and 89% of patients had spikes in the surrounding tissue. Spike distribution and discharge rate did not correlate with outcome. On postresection ECoG, 60% of patients in Group I and 67% of patients in Group II had residual spikes. In Group I, 46% of patients had spikes along the margin of resection and 26% of patients had extramarginal spikes. In Group 11, 50% had spikes along the margin of resection and 67% of patients had extramarginal spikes. Conclusions : The difference in spike distribution in the extramarginal area between the 2 groups was not statistically significant, but showed a trend toward a relationship between postresection spikes and seizure recurrence.