Premium
Comprehensive Biofeedback Versus Self‐Monitored Relaxation in the Treatment of Tension Headache
Author(s) -
Steger Jeffrey C.,
Harper Robert G.
Publication year - 1980
Publication title -
headache: the journal of head and face pain
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.14
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1526-4610
pISSN - 0017-8748
DOI - 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1980.hed2003137.x
Subject(s) - biofeedback , headaches , relaxation (psychology) , tension headache , distress , muscle tension , feeling , physical therapy , relaxation therapy , coping (psychology) , physical medicine and rehabilitation , muscle relaxation , stress management , migraine , psychology , medicine , psychotherapist , anesthesia , surgery , neuroscience , social psychology
SYNOPSIS Muscle contraction headaches have been demonstrated to significantly decrease following EMG biofeedback as well as general relaxation practice. This study contrasted the efficacy of a comprehensive biofeedback and stress management strategy and a self‐monitored home relaxation program in the treatment of 20 tension headache sufferers. The results suggested that while both treatment strategies successfully increased patients' ability to relax and reduce frontalis EMG levels, only the comprehensive biofeedback program was successful in reducing reports of headache pain and feelings of psychological distress. The findings support the utility of a headache treatment model beginning with simple relaxation and progressing on a case by case basis to more comprehensive tension and stress management strategies (like EMG biofeedback and cognitive stress coping techniques) only when the less costly relaxation proves ineffective in altering subjective feelings of pain or distress.