z-logo
Premium
Botulinum Toxin, Physical and Occupational Therapy, and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation to Treat Spastic Upper Limb of Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Study
Author(s) -
RodríguezReyes Gerardo,
AlessiMontero Aldo,
DíazMartínez Leticia,
MirandaDuarte Antonio,
PérezSanpablo Alberto Isaac
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
artificial organs
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.684
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1525-1594
pISSN - 0160-564X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00768.x
Subject(s) - spasticity , spastic , modified ashworth scale , physical medicine and rehabilitation , wrist , range of motion , cerebral palsy , medicine , botulinum toxin , physical therapy , upper limb , plyometrics , randomized controlled trial , anesthesia , surgery , jump , physics , quantum mechanics
Spasticity has been successfully managed with different treatment modalities or combinations. No information is available on the effectiveness or individual contribution of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) combined with physical and occupational therapy and neuromuscular electrical stimulation to treat spastic upper limb. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of such treatment and to inform sample‐size calculations for a randomized controlled trial. BTA was injected into spastic upper limb muscles of 10 children. They received 10 sessions of physical and occupational therapy followed by 10 sessions of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on the wrist extensors (antagonist muscles). Degree of spasticity using the Modified Ashworth scale, active range of motion, and manual function with the Jebsen hand test, were assessed. Meaningful improvement was observed in hand function posttreatment ( P  = 0.03). Median spasticity showed a reduction trend and median amplitude of wrist range of motion registered an increase; however, neither of these were significant ( P  > 0.05). There is evidence of a beneficial effect of the combined treatment. Adequate information has been obtained on main outcome‐measurement variability for calculating sample size for a subsequent study to quantify the treatment effect precisely.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here