Premium
Search for Optimal Frequencies and Amplitudes of Therapeutic Electrical Carotid Sinus Nerve Stimulation by Application of the Evolution Strategy
Author(s) -
Peters Tim K.,
Koralewski HansEberhard,
Zerbst Ekkehard
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
artificial organs
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.684
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1525-1594
pISSN - 0160-564X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1989.tb02848.x
Subject(s) - stimulation , biomedical engineering , medicine , cardiology , voltage , blood pressure , materials science , physics , quantum mechanics
In humans, electrical, bipolar, bilateral carotid sinus nerve stimulation (CSNS; impulse duration 0.35 ms) was applied, using frequencies between 10 and 110 Hz and voltages between individual thresholds and maximal amplitudes of stimulation. Ten anginal patients and two hypertensive patients were studied at an interval of up to 12 years after implantation of electrodes and a radiofrequency receiver for chronic therapeutic CSNS. In search of combinations of frequency and voltage of CSNS, eliciting largest (“optimal”) depressor responses of blood pressure and heart rate in the individual patient, Rechenberg's evolution strategy was applied. This strategy simulates mutation and selection of biological evolution. In each patient and on each test stimulation, a value of quality was computed from actual heart rate and blood pressure values as a selection criterion for the strategy. Either responses to uninterrupted CSNS were investigated, while stimulation parameters were adjusted every 3 min, according to the strategy, or responses to 3 min of CSNS after a change in stimulation parameters were compared to intercalated 3‐min control periods. In each patient, one or more combined settings of frequency and voltage elicited “optimal” responses. In principle, “optimal” CSNS frequencies ranged between 35 and 105 Hz with large interindividual differences. Due to chronic implantation of electrodes and technical features of radiofrequency transmitted stimulation energy, interindividually different voltages led to an optimal response to CSNS. Also according to the present results, the frequency of CSNS has to be determined individually. It is concluded that the evolution strategy was applied successfully, because voltage and frequency settings leading to “optimal” responses were found within 90‐180 min, whereas intrain‐dividual systematic investigations would not be feasible due to their necessarily very long duration. So far, only short‐term responses have been evaluated. A broader use of the strategy in other applications is encouraged, as for example in pacemaker optimization and especially in functional electrostimulation.