z-logo
Premium
The Role of Lymphatic Drainage in Peritoneal Mass Transfer
Author(s) -
Hallett Michael D.,
Lysaght Michael J.,
Farrell Peter C.
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
artificial organs
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.684
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1525-1594
pISSN - 0160-564X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1989.tb02829.x
Subject(s) - lymphatic system , mass transfer coefficient , mass transfer , ultrafiltration (renal) , drainage , continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis , chemistry , peritoneal dialysis , chromatography , surgery , medicine , pathology , ecology , biology
Peritoneal lymphatic drainage has recently been shown to be a contributing factor to both clearance and fluid removal patterns during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. In this report peritoneal transport equations are derived and compared and contrasted with existing models that ignore this term. It was found that for solutes for which the sieving coefficient may be assumed to equal unity, such as urea and creatinine, the values of the mass transfer area coefficient (K o A) are overestimated by the value of the lymphatic drainage rate. In this instance, corrected K o A may be obtained simply by subtracting lymphatic flow rate from the K o A calculated by traditional methods. For larger solutes, such as (ß 2 ‐microglobulin, for which the sieving coefficient may be assumed to equal zero, the value of mass transfer coefficient was underestimated to varying degrees; however, for values of lymphatic drainage rate <60 ml/h the effect will not be clinically measurable. A theoretical model is used to plot the dependence of net fluid removal on peritoneal lymphatic flow, glucose K o A, and hydraulic permeability. Reduction in net ultrafiltered volume, and hence estimation of transperitoneal ultrafiltration, is directly proportional to accumulated lymphatic drainage.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here