Premium
Comparison of Rapid In Situ, Regular In Situ, and Ex Vivo Flushing on Hepatic Function
Author(s) -
Castellanos Javier,
ToledoPereyra Luis H.,
Finkelstein Israel,
Kestenberg William,
Chapman Mona,
Choudhury Sajal
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
artificial organs
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.684
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1525-1594
pISSN - 0160-564X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1988.tb02760.x
Subject(s) - flushing , ex vivo , in situ , in vivo , medicine , perfusion , inferior vena cava , vein , anastomosis , surgery , cardiology , chemistry , biology , endocrinology , microbiology and biotechnology , organic chemistry
The efficacy of three flushing techniques on subsequent liver function was assessed using the in vivo isolated liver perfusion model (ILPM). Livers from brain‐dead mongrel dogs were flushed with cold Euro‐Collins as follows: Group I, rapid in situ flushing (10 min); Group II, regular in situ flushing (45 min); Group HI, ex vivo flushing (10 min). All livers were then heterotopically transplanted into recipients, using the ILPM, by anastomosis of the portal vein, vena cava, and hepatic artery to the recipient's portal vein, iliac vein, and iliac artery. Reperfusion followed for 30 min. Laboratory samples collected at 0, 5, 15, and 30 min showed that hepatic function was not altered by ex vivo flushing and was only slightly altered by rapid in situ flushing. Regular in situ flushing proved to be damaging to livers. Histological analysis confirmed these findings. Therefore, either rapid in situ or ex vivo flushing can be safely used by the transplant specialist.