Premium
High‐grade metamorphic processes which influence Archaean gold deposits, with particular reference to Big Bell, Australia
Author(s) -
PHILLIPS G. NEIL,
NOOY DORRIT DE
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
journal of metamorphic geology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.639
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1525-1314
pISSN - 0263-4929
DOI - 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1988.tb00410.x
Subject(s) - metamorphic rock , geology , geochemistry , mafic , metamorphism , biotite , archean , metamorphic facies , partial melting , schist , greenschist , feldspar , quartz , crust , facies , geomorphology , paleontology , structural basin
Mineralogical and geochemical evidence indicates that partial melting and desulphidation have occurred in the Big Bell gold deposit. Decarbonation may also have occurred, to account for the lack of a carbonate alteration halo; this is compatible with the present data, but difficult to test. The Big Bell deposit consists of auriferous sulphide‐bearing (‘lode’;) schists with muscovite and K‐feldspar, and surrounding biotite schists, all derived by intense premetamorphic alteration of rocks of mafic composition. Assemblages which include cordierite‐sillimanite‐K‐feldspar‐garnet‐biotite‐quartz suggest peak metamorphic conditions of 4–5 kbar, and 650–700° C, based on phase relations, geobaro‐meters and garnet‐biotite Fe‐Mg exchange partitioning. Partial melting occurred at peak metamorphism, particularly in the altered mafic rocks in and around the deposit, and its occurrence may have been essential to the preservation of the deposit. Melting greatly limited the importance of devolatilization reactions, resulting in negligible aqueous fluids and no means of removing appreciable gold. Minor gold loss may have accompanied desulphidation. A diversity of complex metamorphic assemblages occurs around the mine, compared to the assemblages developed regionally; variable bulk rock composition influences this contrast, but there is no evidence of higher metamorphic grades at the mine, nor that this might have been the prime control on the different assemblages in this narrow belt. It is suggested that the Big Bell and Hemlo deposits are the higher metamorphic grade equivalents of the more abundant greenschist facies gold deposits within Archaean greenstone belts. This interpretation is favoured by the host rock setting and geochemical characteristics of Big Bell. Alternative models that suggest that this class of deposit is a new type must account for the absence of high‐grade equivalents of the greenschist facies deposits and also the lack of low‐grade equivalents of the Big Bell/Hemlo type. Archaean gold deposits in high‐grade metamorphic terrains have undergone a series of processes that are not recorded in the more typical gold deposits of the greenschist facies.