Open AccessThe Differences Between ACE Inhibitor‐Treated and Calcium Channel Blocker‐Treated Hypertensive Patients
Author(s) -
Mclnnes Gordon T.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
the journal of clinical hypertension
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.909
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1751-7176
pISSN - 1524-6175
DOI - 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2003.00511.x
Subject(s) - medicine , calcium channel blocker , blood pressure , ace inhibitor , observational study , angiotensin converting enzyme , calcium channel , antihypertensive drug , cardiology , clinical trial , intensive care medicine , calcium
Large‐scale outcome trials have demonstrated that blood pressure reduction with angiotensin‐converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or calcium channel blockers (CCBs) is associated with reduced cardiovascular complications in hypertension. Comparative trials against conventional drugs and between ACE inhibitors and CCBs have failed to reveal conclusive differences in cause‐specific outcomes. Studies in high‐risk patients suggest that ACE inhibitors are superior to CCBs and other drugs in protection against cardiovascular events and renal disease. Very long‐term prospectively collected observational data from the Glasgow Blood Pressure Clinic and the UK General Practice Research Database strongly support an advantage of ACE inhibitors over CCBs for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Considering all the available information, it can be concluded that the use of CCBs in the routine therapy of hypertension cannot be recommended while wider use of ACE inhibitors, along with low‐dose diuretics and β blockers, appears justified.