Premium
Evaluación de la Efectividad de las Reservas Marinas sobre Invertebrados Sésiles Longevos Recolectados de Manera No Sostenible
Author(s) -
LINARES CRISTINA,
GARRABOU JOAQUIM,
HEREU BERNAT,
DIAZ DAVID,
MARSCHAL CHRISTIAN,
SALA ENRIC,
ZABALA MIKEL
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
conservation biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.2
H-Index - 222
eISSN - 1523-1739
pISSN - 0888-8892
DOI - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01795.x
Subject(s) - marine reserve , coral , marine protected area , fishing , fishery , ecology , benthic zone , octocorallia , nature reserve , geography , mediterranean climate , marine ecosystem , invertebrate , cnidaria , biology , coelenterata , ecosystem , habitat
Although the rapid recovery of fishes after establishment of a marine reserve is well known, much less is known about the response of long‐lived, sessile, benthic organisms to establishment of such reserves. Since antiquity, Mediterranean red coral (Corallium rubrum) has been harvested intensively for use in jewelry, and its distribution is currently smaller than its historical size throughout the Mediterranean Sea. To assess whether establishment of marine reserves is associated with a change in the size and number of red coral colonies that historically were not harvested sustainably, we analyzed temporal changes in mean colony diameter and density from 1992 to 2005 within red coral populations at different study sites in the Medes Islands Marine Reserve (established in 1992) and in adjacent unprotected areas. Moreover, we compared colony size in the Medes Islands Marine Reserve, where recreational diving is allowed and poaching has been observed after reserve establishment, with colony size in three other marine protected areas (Banyuls, Carry‐le‐Rouet, and Scandola) with the enforced prohibition of fishing and diving. At the end of the study, the size of red coral colonies at all sampling sites in the Medes Islands was significantly smaller than predicted by growth models and smaller than those in marine protected areas without fishing and diving. The annual number of recreational dives and the percent change in the basal diameter of red coral colonies were negatively correlated, which suggests that abrasion by divers may increase the mortality rates of the largest red coral colonies within this reserve. Our study is the first quantitative assessment of a poaching event, which was detected during our monitoring in 2002, inside the marine reserve. Poaching was associated with a loss of approximately 60% of the biomass of red coral colonies.