Premium
Underestimating Risks to the Northern Spotted Owl in Fire‐Prone Forests: Response to Hanson et al.
Author(s) -
SPIES THOMAS A.,
MILLER JAY D.,
BUCHANAN JOSEPH B.,
LEHMKUHL JOHN F.,
FRANKLIN JERRY F.,
HEALEY SEAN P.,
HESSBURG PAUL F.,
SAFFORD HUGH D.,
COHEN WARREN B.,
KENNEDY REBECCA S.H.,
KNAPP ERIC E.,
AGEE JAMES K.,
MOEUR MELINDA
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
conservation biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.2
H-Index - 222
eISSN - 1523-1739
pISSN - 0888-8892
DOI - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01414.x
Subject(s) - wildlife , geography , service (business) , miller , agriculture , wildfire suppression , forestry , archaeology , ecology , cartography , business , firefighting , marketing , biology
The development of conservation plans for Northern Spotted Owls (NSO) (Strix occidentalis caurina) in disturbance-prone landscapes requires evaluation of multiple threats and careful consideration of the consequences of management actions intended to reduce risk. Hanson et al. (2009) used downwardly revised estimates of recent old-forest losses to high-severity wildfire to argue that the recent NSO recovery plan (USDI 2008) overestimates fire risk to the NSO in dry, fire-prone forests. We believe their analysis is erroneous and deficient and does not support their conclusions. Furthermore, they show a bias against active management by ignoring recent science and risk factors in dry forests that do not support their opinions.