z-logo
Premium
Análisis Transnacional de Cómo la Inequidad Económica Predice la Pérdida de Biodiversidad
Author(s) -
HOLLAND TIM G.,
PETERSON GARRY D.,
GONZALEZ ANDREW
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
conservation biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.2
H-Index - 222
eISSN - 1523-1739
pISSN - 0888-8892
DOI - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01207.x
Subject(s) - akaike information criterion , inequality , economics , ecological footprint , biodiversity , socioeconomic status , economic inequality , kuznets curve , population , index (typography) , threatened species , econometrics , geography , ecology , statistics , mathematics , demography , biology , sustainability , mathematical analysis , sociology , habitat , world wide web , computer science
  We used socioeconomic models that included economic inequality to predict biodiversity loss, measured as the proportion of threatened plant and vertebrate species, across 50 countries. Our main goal was to evaluate whether economic inequality, measured as the Gini index of income distribution, improved the explanatory power of our statistical models. We compared four models that included the following: only population density, economic footprint (i.e., the size of the economy relative to the country area), economic footprint and income inequality (Gini index), and an index of environmental governance. We also tested the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis, but it was not supported by the data. Statistical comparisons of the models revealed that the model including both economic footprint and inequality was the best predictor of threatened species. It significantly outperformed population density alone and the environmental governance model according to the Akaike information criterion. Inequality was a significant predictor of biodiversity loss and significantly improved the fit of our models. These results confirm that socioeconomic inequality is an important factor to consider when predicting rates of anthropogenic biodiversity loss.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here