Premium
Cost‐Effective Management of Snake River Chinook Salmon: Response to Wilson et al.
Author(s) -
HALSING DAVID L.,
MOORE MICHAEL R.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
conservation biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.2
H-Index - 222
eISSN - 1523-1739
pISSN - 0888-8892
DOI - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01171.x
Subject(s) - citation , corporation , chinook wind , library science , art history , operations research , history , archaeology , law , political science , computer science , fish <actinopterygii> , fishery , engineering , biology , oncorhynchus
Management decisions related to recovery of Snake River springand summer-run (SRSS) chinook salmon should be informed by sound science. The Comment by Wilson et al. (2009 [this issue]) has the apparent purpose of discrediting the quality of our analysis in Halsing and Moore (2008), such that the results would not be used to inform decisions. But we agree on use of our results: although our methodology is sound, the results should not directly guide such decision making. We state this at important points in our paper: in the abstract,