z-logo
Premium
Predicción de la Extinción de Plantas con Base en Curvas Especie‐Área en Fragmentos de Pradera con Riqueza Beta Alta
Author(s) -
WILSEY BRIAN J.,
MARTIN LEANNE M.,
POLLEY H. WAYNE
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
conservation biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.2
H-Index - 222
eISSN - 1523-1739
pISSN - 0888-8892
DOI - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00250.x
Subject(s) - species richness , extinction (optical mineralogy) , fragmentation (computing) , ecology , body size and species richness , insular biogeography , biodiversity , geography , species diversity , biology , paleontology
  Species‐area relationships and island biogeography theory are commonly used to predict how species richness will decline with fragmentation. There are a variety of largely untested assumptions in these approaches, including the assumptions that populations are distributed uniformly before fragmentation, and that local extinctions are due to effects of small population sizes. If populations are not distributed uniformly, then populations can be abundant locally but rare globally. This would cause extinction rates to be smaller than predicted. We tested extinction theory by developing estimates of the number of plant species that should be present in small tallgrass prairie fragments and then testing the uniformity assumption by partitioning species richness into α (within site) and β (among site) components in Iowa prairies. Many more native prairie plant species were present in surveys of prairie fragments (491) than was predicted based on theory (27–207). A large proportion (75%) of the total species richness was β richness. We suggest that the high proportion of β richness was responsible for the shallow species‐area slopes and the lower than expected number of species losses and that a better understanding of what determines β diversity will improve predictions of fragmentation effects on richness of plants. We also suggest that plants in prairie remnants may be best conserved by protecting different prairie types rather than by protecting a few large areas containing a single prairie type.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here