z-logo
Premium
Efectividad Ecológica de Esquemas Agri‐Ambientes en Diferentes Paisajes Agrícolas en Holanda
Author(s) -
KLEIJN DAVID,
BERENDSE FRANK,
SMIT RUBEN,
GILISSEN NIELS,
SMIT JOHN,
BRAK BASTIAAN,
GROENEVELD ROLF
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
conservation biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.2
H-Index - 222
eISSN - 1523-1739
pISSN - 0888-8892
DOI - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00550.x
Subject(s) - species richness , abundance (ecology) , biodiversity , geography , ecology , agriculture , range (aeronautics) , diversity (politics) , agroforestry , biology , materials science , sociology , anthropology , composite material
  Agri‐environment schemes are an instrument used by western European countries to counteract the negative effects of contemporary agriculture on biodiversity, but not much is known about their effectiveness. We investigated the ecological effects of Dutch agri‐environment schemes aimed at promoting botanical diversity or meadow birds, and we tested whether the effectiveness of the schemes depends on landscape type or structure. In three different types of landscape, we surveyed plants, birds, bees, and hover flies on 78 paired fields that either had agri‐environment schemes or were managed conventionally, and we collected data on a range of different environmental variables. Neither plant species richness nor abundance of meadow birds was higher on fields with agri‐environment schemes. Landscape type had a significant effect on both species groups, but the effects of the schemes were independent of landscape type. Neither the diversity of plants nor the abundance of birds was related to any of the environmental variables. Agri‐environment schemes designed to promote plant species richness or bird abundance did have positive side‐effects because they enhanced the species richness of bees and hover flies, irrespective of the type of landscape. Furthermore, landscape type, groundwater level (hover flies), and area of wooded edges (bees) significantly affected both species groups. The failure of the schemes to promote the target species may be related to the high intensity of land use in The Netherlands. Simple conservation measures taken by farmers may not be sufficient to counteract the impact of factors that are often controlled at the landscape level (e.g., hydrology). Similar studies in other countries are needed to place the results of our study into a European context.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here